Showing posts with label 1-star. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1-star. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

“Titan’s Tears” by Chad Lester

Unfortunately, this wasn’t for me, and I stopped reading a third of the way through.

I wish I could say what the book was about - but it eludes me, even though I’ve read a full third of it. There are two major threads: Belle has a slightly mysterious background and goes to work for the mysterious Sophia, CEO of the mysterious Ecclestone Evolution, who are doing some mysterious work. It’s a grab-bag of future tech in a callous and unfeeling world: AI that’s “orders of magnitude” more powerful than a human brain, life-extending medical breakthroughs, bringing extinct animals back to life, lack of ethics or any kind of oversight, etc; and then there is Seth, a downtrodden worker just trying to make his way in a callous and unfeeling world, after a string of personal tragedies, while everyone’s jobs are being replaced by machines and there doesn’t appear to be any employment law.

Presumably these two threads come together later in the book.

There were a few reasons why I decided not to continue with this book, but overall it’s because my lack of engagement with any of the characters, coupled with a writing style that I found to be a distracting obstacle to my enjoyment, outweighed my curiosity about what was going on.

The writing style includes a lot of exposition - we’re told about what people are thinking and feeling, rather than allowing it to unfold through the actions and reactions of the characters. For me, this contributed significantly to my lack of engagement. But then suddenly there are pages of unbroken direct dialog between two characters - just line after line of quoted speech for page after page. I lost track of who was speaking several times. Then we’re back to the ponderous exposition again.

The pacing is also extremely inconsistent. The storyline around Belle and Sophia is almost glacially slow. For chapter after chapter very little happens beyond the drip-feed of mysterious goings-on at Ecclestone Evolution (did I mention that it was mysterious?). Every so often a nugget of what’s going on is revealed, but this feels like the author is dragging it out, presumably to create suspense and intrigue, but I found it transparent and irritating. And then Seth’s storyline is at express pace - hardly has he navigated one major or traumatic life event, than he’s negotiating the next. And while there is tragedy in his story, the whirlwind of plot doesn’t allow the time or space for any kind of emotional development or engagement.

The author seems to have some broad brush political opinions about corporate behaviour, which are ladled on in big dollops in both Seth’s storyline and Belle/Sophia’s - and it’s not clear whether these would have eventually become central to the plot, or whether the author just has a bit of an axe to grind and is using this book as a platform. And at one point, one of the characters who has a history of mental illness is referred to as “backwards” by one of the other characters. So perhaps I’ll take the author’s kind offer to bestow the benefit of his opinions on me, and leave it at the door.

Kthxbye.

Thank you #NetGalley and the author for the free review copy of #TitansTears in exchange for an honest review - for which I also apologise. All opinions are, clearly, my own.

My rating: ★☆☆☆☆

NetGalley review

Sunday, April 14, 2024

“Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine” by Gail Honeyman

No. Just… No.

Did not finish, at 23%

If I’m being generous, then this book is casually uncaring. If I submit to my discomfort reading this, then I’m going to say it’s cruel and heartless.

Eleanor Oliphant is obviously not completely fine - that’s no surprise as the title is intended to be ironic. However, she’s clearly had some horrific trauma early in her life. I have no training that qualifies me to say this, but it seems like she has PTSD. She may well have other disorders that could be identified and addressed with appropriate therapies. However, despite the fact that she has social workers visit regularly who are clearly familiar with her awful background, there is no evidence that Eleanor has had any issues diagnosed or is getting any meaningful support or treatment.

As a result of her damaged upbringing, she has difficulty relating to people and normal social situations. And she drinks heavily - something that also seems to be treated in a casual throw-away manner. And through all this, we’re invited to laugh at her as she makes various ‘humorous’ mistakes as she misjudges various situations. These same situations mightbe funny if the reason for Eleanor’s detachment and lack of social understanding weren’t so tragic (even so, I found the ‘humour’ quite heavy handed), but in the context of the what we’re supposed to believe about Eleanor’s background and upbringing, it feels like I’m being encouraged to point and laugh at the amusing freak. The freak who is a deeply damaged individual.

OK, so I stopped at only 23% of the way through the book, and maybe the author turns it around later on in a way that can mitigate this first quarter. But I searched out some other reviews from readers who feel the same way but had the tenacity to see it through to the end, and I don’t believe that’s the case.

So, no. Just… No.

My rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Monday, March 13, 2023

"Quite" by Claudia Winkleman

I like Claudia Winkleman, and was hoping for some depth… for I’m sure she has some. And while the chapter on art was passionate, and the chapter on Strictly was heartfelt, the rest (what I managed to read) felt shallow and lazy, and with disappointingly little insight.

I really must break my habit of hoping for the best with celebrity autobiographies and the like.

My rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Friday, January 20, 2023

"The Secret Language of Cats" by Susanne Schötz

I had high hopes that this book would provide some insight into cat communication, and perhaps some additional understanding of cat behaviour. I was disappointed that the book is focussed on the analysis of cat vocalisations - precisely what they sound like - with much less insight about what they mean. The research seems to be anecdotal based on a small number of cats that the author is familiar with, rather than based on broad studies. Overall I was disappointed and skimmed most of the book.

My rating: ★☆☆☆☆

Popular Posts